ADATA: The Complete Guide

This guide sits between the two extremes this section has seen so far. Where G.Skill’s own website could not be read on any route tried, ADATA’s main site, its XPG storefront, its industrial storefront and its TRUSTA storefront all render normally — real navigation, real product names, real category pages 1 2 3 4. What fails is narrower and more specific: esg.adata.com and careers.adata.com both fail with SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED, which this site’s standing finding attributes to this environment’s own TLS-terminating egress gateway presenting its own certificate rather than to anything ADATA’s server actually serves — such a failure is recorded as “could not be retrieved,” nothing more 5. Separately, Taiwan’s MOPS company-filing system is ROBOTS_DISALLOWED and the TPEx OpenAPI returns a 403, so neither could be read directly either.

The gap those blocks leave is filled, unusually well for this section, by a document ADATA hosts itself: a PDF “Intellectual Property Report” for fiscal year 2022, served from the company’s own webapi3.adata.com subdomain rather than from the blocked investor-relations pages 7. It is a static file, not a client-rendered page, which is presumably why it opens where the equivalent HTML pages do not.

Two addresses and two capital figures appear across this guide’s sources, and both pairs are reported rather than collapsed into one. Taiwan’s Ministry of Economic Affairs registry — read live, from the ministry’s own open-data API, not a mirror — gives the registered office as the 25th floor of a Neihu District building in Taipei City, with paid-in capital of NT$3,364,634,180 as of this check 6. ADATA’s own Intellectual Property Report, filed for fiscal year 2022, instead gives the 18th floor of a Zhonghe District building in New Taipei City, with paid-in capital of NT$2,667,870,040 as of that filing 7. The capital difference is consistent with the dates being different — paid-in capital can rise between a 2022 filing and a live 2026 registry read — though no capital-increase filing was itself retrieved to confirm that explanation.

The address difference is better supported on one side than the other. The Zhonghe District / Liancheng Road address is not unique to the IP report: it is also the address USPTO’s own TSDR system returns, independently, for three separate ADATA trademark registrations checked directly for this guide 8 9 10. That is four official filings, from two different institutions (ADATA’s own report and the U.S. government’s trademark database), agreeing on one address. The Taipei/Neihu address appears only in the Taiwan company registry. This page still does not declare the registry address wrong — a company’s registered office and the address it gives on a trademark filing are not required to match, and Taiwan companies commonly list a registered agent’s or an earlier office’s address in the government registry — but the weight of independent agreement sits on the Liancheng Road side.

The two trademark cancellations are the most concrete dated events this check could confirm independently, and they follow the same pattern this section has already seen with G.Skill. USPTO’s own TSDR system shows the “XPG” word mark for computer memory hardware, registration 5,222,822, cancelled 29 December 2023, and the “ERATO” word mark, registration 5,346,870, cancelled 7 June 2024 — both for the same administrative reason, a missed Section 8 filing, not a dispute 8 9. Neither cancellation appears to reflect the brand being retired: XPG remains ADATA’s live, actively marketed gaming sub-brand on its own storefront today, and a further wave of XPG-related marks (including “XPG PRIME,” filed under two separate serial numbers) appears in the same portfolio listing, with no filing date independently re-verified for either 2 11.

Justia’s own individual mark pages had shown both the XPG memory mark and the ERATO mark as “700 — Registered” — current status information that a direct TSDR check for this guide found to be wrong in both cases 12 13. This page reports the TSDR status, not Justia’s, and treats the rest of Justia’s portfolio listing — the names, serial numbers and filing dates it gives for ADATA’s other marks — as a name list rather than a current-status list, since it has now been shown wrong twice for marks this guide checked directly 11 8 9.

This is a materially fuller lineup section than this section’s G.Skill guide could support, because the storefronts themselves — not just a forum or a trademark filing — are reachable here. Even so, what is reported above is category and model names read from each storefront’s own navigation and highlighted-product sections, not full specification sheets; a reader wanting a timing table, a capacity list or a full SKU range for any one product should treat this section as a map of what ADATA sells, not a datasheet 1 2 3 4.

TRUSTA’s own page additionally names two announced partnerships — with FADU and Giga Computing — and a power-efficiency presentation at OCP APAC 2025, positioning the brand toward AI-infrastructure and hyperscale buyers rather than the desktop-enthusiast market XPG serves 4. Neither partnership is described in further detail on the page this check could read.

Those three standards are worth naming precisely, since each covers a different part of the manufacturing and quality picture rather than the product itself. AEC-Q100 is an Automotive Electronics Council stress-test qualification for integrated circuits; IATF 16949 is an automotive-sector quality-management-system standard, describing how a manufacturer runs its processes rather than a property of any one part; and ISO/SAE 21434 is a road-vehicle cybersecurity engineering standard 3. ADATA Industrial’s own page names all three as standards its products meet, without stating which specific product lines carry which certification, or linking a certificate for independent verification 3.

The Suzhou and Brazil facilities are named only once, in a single sentence of ADATA’s own 2022 filing, without further detail on what each site produces, its scale, or when it opened 7. No source read for this guide corroborates or expands on either location independently — not ADATA’s own storefronts, not the Taiwan registry, and not any trademark filing.

The registered-office addresses — Neihu District, Taipei City per the Taiwan registry, and Zhonghe District, New Taipei City per the company’s own filings and three independent USPTO trademark records — describe corporate offices, not manufacturing plants, and neither should be read as a factory address 6 7 8 9 10.

AMD’s EXPO partners page displays ADATA’s logo in a “Partners” section alongside five other brands, without a paragraph of running text describing any of them individually — the association is shown visually, by logo and model name, rather than stated in a sentence 14. This page reports it exactly that way, as a listing rather than as quoted prose, consistent with this site’s rule against treating a retrieval tool’s own composed summary as if it were the source’s verbatim text.

No equivalent statement about Intel XMP support on any ADATA product was found on any page reachable from this environment, though XMP support on DDR4/DDR5 desktop memory is widely assumed across the market and is not disputed here — it is simply not confirmed by a source this page can cite for ADATA specifically.

This section stops short of a full specification for a specific reason: the storefronts read for this guide are marketing and category pages, not datasheet repositories, and the deeper product and datasheet pages behind them were not individually retrieved this session. A reader who needs an exact specification for a named ADATA, XPG, Industrial or TRUSTA part should treat this page as confirming only that the product line and form factor exist as described, and should look to the specific product page or a retailer listing for full timings, capacities and voltages.

This section follows the section’s standing rule directly: a page shows a price only where the source read for it publishes one, and otherwise says so plainly. None of the sources read for this guide — the Taiwan registry, ADATA’s own Intellectual Property Report, JEDEC’s member list, AMD’s partner page, the USPTO trademark records, or ADATA’s own four storefronts — publishes a product price of any kind 6 7 15 14 1.

This is the same finding this codex has recorded for most other module brands in this section — a module brand assembles and brands memory built from chips it does not itself manufacture, and naming the chip supplier is the exception rather than the rule among the storefronts this codex has read. For ADATA specifically, none of its four storefronts read for this guide — ADATA, XPG, Industrial or TRUSTA — names a DRAM or NAND supplier on any page this check reached 1 2 3 4.

TRUSTA’s own page names two specific counterparties — FADU and Giga Computing — in the context of announced partnerships, and a presentation at OCP APAC 2025 on power efficiency, which points toward hyperscale and cloud-infrastructure buyers as TRUSTA’s intended market 4. Neither partnership’s commercial terms or scope is described on the page this check could read.

The “3,000 established customers” and “120 countries” figures are the company’s own characterization of its reach, from a document filed for fiscal year 2022; no more recent equivalent figure was found on any page reachable from this environment 7.

The confectionery trademark is the most surprising single fact this guide could confirm, precisely because it is easy to verify and easy to misread. USPTO’s own record shows it filed 3 February 2021, registered 18 January 2022, and still active today, covering “chewing gum, bubble gum, candy, confectionery… nougat, chocolate, cookies, cakes, cereal-based snack foods, tea… coffee… chocolate-based beverages, and ice cream” under International Class 030 10. Nothing read for this guide connects this filing to an actual product — XPG’s own storefront sells memory, storage, PC components and gaming peripherals, nothing edible 2. Companies sometimes file defensive trademarks across unrelated goods classes to prevent a brand name from being used elsewhere; this page does not assert that is the reason here, only that no other explanation was found either.

The specification gap deserves a more careful statement than “not found,” because it differs in kind from G.Skill’s equivalent gap in this section. G.Skill’s product pages could not be reached at all; ADATA’s storefronts render fully, but this session’s check read their category and highlighted-product pages rather than drilling into each individual product’s own specification sheet. The gap here is one of session scope, not of site accessibility — a distinction worth making explicitly so a reader does not conflate the two brands’ very different situations.

The financial-side gap is the more structural one. ADATA’s investor-relations pages were not tested directly this session; a sustainability subdomain that fails on TLS grounds specific to this environment, and two Taiwan government filing systems that refuse automated access, are what this check did confirm blocked. Together they mean this guide’s financial picture rests on a single company-filed PDF from fiscal year 2022 and a live but comparatively thin government company-registry record, rather than on ADATA’s own current investor disclosures 5 7 6.

This is a narrower finding than either “ADATA has no India presence” or “ADATA names Indian partners” — it is only that none of the four storefronts this check read surfaces India-specific information on the pages reached. XPG and ADATA-branded memory and storage are widely sold through Indian retail channels in practice, but no page read for this guide is the source of that observation, so no retail-availability claim is made here beyond what ADATA’s own sites state 1 2.

An Indian buyer’s practical position is the same one this section’s own guide to buying memory in India sets out for brands with no published Indian channel on their own site: the retailer is the only party whose terms are actually knowable in advance.

The most useful single gap this guide could not close is a current specification sheet for any one ADATA, XPG, Industrial or TRUSTA product. Every storefront read for this guide names products by category and model; none was drilled into for a full datasheet this session. A future pass that reads individual product pages, rather than category and highlight pages, would materially strengthen the lineup and specs sections above.